Content optimisation platform with published $129-$399/mo pricing, unlimited seats, and query tracking limited to ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude.
Content teams that publish on a steady cadence and want per-page grading inside the tools writers already use - reports run in Google Docs, Microsoft Word and WordPress, and drafts can be shared by link so freelancers never need an account. Seats and projects are unlimited on every published plan, so cost scales with pages and drafts rather than headcount, which suits agencies and in-house teams that rotate contract writers.
Clearscope meters pages and drafts, not seats, and the entitlements are small at the entry tier: Essentials is $129/mo for 50 tracked queries, 50 pages, 20 topic explorations and 20 drafts per month. Extra drafts cost $50 on Essentials against $20 on Business, and the pricing page never states the unit for those add-on prices. Its AI visibility feature, Query Tracking, names only ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude - no Perplexity, Microsoft Copilot, Google AI Overviews or AI Mode - and publishes no refresh frequency, so it is not a substitute for a dedicated AEO tracker. No API is mentioned on the pricing or product pages.
Pros
Cons
Only partly. Its Query Tracking feature reports how a brand is mentioned and which competitors are recommended across ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude. That is three engines, with Perplexity, Microsoft Copilot, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode absent, and no refresh frequency published. If AI visibility is the main thing you are buying, a dedicated tracker will cover more engines and document its cadence.
Four things: tracked queries, pages, topic explorations per month and drafts per month. Essentials gives 50 tracked queries, 50 pages, 20 explorations and 20 drafts for $129/mo; Business gives 300, 300, 50 and 20 for $399/mo. Note that Business triples queries and pages but keeps drafts at 20, so heavy drafting teams will buy the draft add-on regardless of tier.
No. The pricing page lists unlimited users and unlimited projects on Essentials, Business and Enterprise, with no additional-seat price. Writers can also open a draft through a shareable link without needing their own Clearscope account. Cost therefore scales with published volume rather than team size, which is the main structural difference from per-seat content tools.
Not that the vendor documents. Neither the pricing page nor the product pages mention an API, and the only integrations named are Google Docs, Microsoft Word and WordPress. Enterprise plans list crawler whitelisting and SSO but no programmatic access. If you need Clearscope grades in a warehouse or BI tool, confirm what is available with their team before committing.
Facts sourced from the vendor’s own site, last verified 2026-10-10.
The Weekly Source
One email a week. New listings, repriced tools, and the ones we would skip - including this one if its pricing changes.
