Generative construction scheduling that simulates millions of build sequences from a P6, Primavera Cloud or MS Project programme to cut duration and cost.
Planners and project controls teams who optimise build sequence and resource use on major capital works. The vendor's FAQ states ALICE is best used on projects with a value above $75M, and its pricing page states customers generally use it on projects with a construction value of at least $75M. The quote form's own project-type list is Industrial / Energy / Data Centers, Infrastructure / Transport, Commercial / Institutional and Residential / Mixed-use, and its organisation-type list includes general contractor, owner/developer, consultant, government, architect and trade or speciality contractor. It is an optioneering tool rather than a reporting tool: ALICE Optimize starts from an existing Primavera P6, Primavera Cloud or MS Project schedule, and ALICE Model generates a baseline from an uploaded 3D model using recipes for means and methods.
Check fit with sales if your projects sit below the figure the vendor publishes: its own FAQ states ALICE is best used on projects with a value above $75M, and the quote form asks for typical project sizes in USD. It is also the wrong tool if you want takeoff or cost estimating, since it optimises sequence and resource rather than measuring quantities. Pricing is quote-only with no tiers, numbers, currency or minimum commitment published, and there is no free trial, only a demo and a consultation call. Schedule upload is documented from Oracle P6 and Oracle Primavera Cloud in .xer, .xml, .xlsx or .csv, so confirm your scheduler exports one of those. For ALICE Model the vendor names Autodesk Revit (RVT) and Navisworks (NWC/NWD) as its most recommended model formats and accepts DWG, NWC or IFC geometry exports from other platforms, so an unusual model source still needs confirming. The trust page offers to 'select your data region' but names no regions, so a specific data-residency requirement cannot be verified from the site despite the regional login portals.
Pros
Cons
The vendor's own FAQ states ALICE is best used on projects with a value above $75M, and the pricing page states that customers generally use ALICE on projects with a construction value of at least $75M. The quote form's project-type options are Industrial / Energy / Data Centers, Infrastructure / Transport, Commercial / Institutional and Residential / Mixed-use, and the form asks for typical project sizes in USD.
Yes. ALICE Optimize is documented as starting from your existing Microsoft Project, Oracle Primavera P6 or Oracle Primavera Cloud schedule, with direct upload from P6 and Primavera Cloud in .xer, .xml, .xlsx or .csv and a stated ability to sync changes between ALICE and Primavera. ALICE Model instead builds a baseline from an uploaded 3D model, where the vendor names Autodesk Revit (RVT) and Navisworks (NWC/NWD) as most recommended and accepts DWG, NWC or IFC exports.
ALICE runs regional login portals for global, UK/EU, Australia and Canada, and the FAQ states remote staff cover customers in the UK, France, Australia and Canada. Headquarters is Menlo Park, California, with offices in Prague and Pune. The trust page offers to select a data region but names none, so no specific residency location is confirmed on the site.
It is quote-only. The pricing page publishes no numbers, tiers, currency or minimum commitment, saying only that pricing is flexible based on the size and scope of your projects, and there is no free trial. The vendor does state that unlimited users, unlimited data, technical support, cloud-based software, workshops and training, and implementation support are included in whatever you are quoted.
Facts sourced from the vendor’s own site, last verified 2026-10-24.
The Weekly Source
One email a week. New listings, repriced tools, and the ones we would skip - including this one if its pricing changes.
